Ferrell

Amber Ferrell, et al. v. SnapCommerce Holdings, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20254:25-cv-03160California2,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 AMBER FERRELL, et al., Case No. 25-cv-03160-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

SNAPCOMMERCE HOLDINGS, INC., et EVIDENTIARY HEARING al., Re: ECF Nos. 15, 24 Defendants.

13 Before the Court are a motion to compel arbitration and an administrative motion for an evidentiary hearing filed by Defendants SnapCommerce Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Super.com and SnapMoney, Inc. d/b/a Super.com (together, “Super”). ECF Nos. 15, 24. The Court will deny both motions. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Plaintiffs Amber Ferrell and Sara Schneider, individually and on behalf of a putative class, filed this action on April 8, 2025, regarding Super’s alleged practice of sending text message solicitations and making commercial telephone calls to consumers who have placed themselves on the National Do Not Call Registry. ECF No. 1 ¶ 1. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.