Betty T. Corpuz v. Mr. Cooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BETTY T. CORPUZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-02347-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED

MR. COOPER, IFP, AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RE-

FILE A SIGNED COMPLAINT

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 16 Plaintiff Betty T. Corpuz is representing herself in this action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP. I. LEGAL STANDARDS All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047,…