Natasha Mora v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, Christopher M. Klein, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Black Horse Capital, Fine Capital Investments, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATASHA MORA, 12 Petitioner, No. 2:25-cv-2299-TLN-SCR 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY ORDER
COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
15 OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
DIVISION,
16 Respondent, 17 and 18 CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, United States 19 Bankruptcy Judge, BLACK HORSE
CAPITAL, FINE CAPITAL
20 INVESTMENTS, et al.,
21 Real Party in Interest.
22 23 Petitioner Natasha Mora (“Petitioner”) initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of 24 Mandamus (“Petition”) on August 13, 2025. Because Petitioner is proceeding pro se, this matter 25 was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 26 On August 29, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 27 recommending dismissal of the Petition and denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order, 28 which were served on Petitioner and contained notice that any objections to the findings and 1 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14)…