Natasha Mora v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, Christopher M. Klein, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Black Horse Capital, Fine Capital Investments, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-02299California725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATASHA MORA, Petitioner, No. 2:25-cv-2299-TLN-SCR v. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY ORDER

COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT

OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO

DIVISION,

16 Respondent, 17 and 18 CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge, BLACK HORSE

CAPITAL, FINE CAPITAL

INVESTMENTS, et al.,

Real Party in Interest.

22 Petitioner Natasha Mora (“Petitioner”) initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Mandamus (“Petition”) on August 13, 2025. Because Petitioner is proceeding pro se, this matter was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On August 29, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, recommending dismissal of the Petition and denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order, which were served on Petitioner and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.