Cortez

Maurice Fauntain Herron, Jr. aka Murrice Herron v. C/O Cortez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-02429California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE FAUNTAIN HERRON, JR., No. 2:25-cv-2429 CSK P aka MURRICE HERRON, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS & v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 C/O CORTEZ, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed September 3, 2025, plaintiff was notified that his complaint was not signed as required under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file a complaint bearing his signature, and was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that plaintiff’s unsigned complaint be stricken and this action be dismissed. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a signed complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s unsigned complaint (ECF No. 1) is stricken; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. Further, IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.