Baldwin

Anthony Lee Baldwin v. Brian Cleveland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20255:25-cv-05898California2,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY LEE BALDWIN, Case No. 25-cv-05898-PCP

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND,

v. GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

APPLICATIONS

BRIAN CLEVELAND, Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 8 Defendant.

12 Anthony Baldwin filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding events which occurred while he was incarcerated in Santa Cruz County, California. Dkt. No. 6 (“Complaint”). For the reasons stated below, the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Mr. Baldwin’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. I. Background At all relevant times, Mr. Baldwin was incarcerated at a detention facility in Santa Cruz County, California. See generally Compl. As a defendant, Mr. Bailey names only Chief of Jail Operations Cleveland. Id. at 2.1 Mr. Baldwin alleges that he is hearing-impaired. Compl. at 5. His impairment leaves him “unable to hear the dayroom TV or … the IPs tablet system.” Id. Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.