Franey
Michael Franey, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL FRANEY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-06693-SVK
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION
FOR REMAND
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 28 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court are two motions: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand this action to state court for lack of diversity jurisdiction, because Defendant Advanced Micro Devices (“AMD”) is a citizen of California with its headquarters in Santa Clara; and Defendant AMD’s Motion to Dismiss the claims against it under Rule 12(b)(6) and to find that AMD was misjoined. Dkts. 13 and 28, respectively. As made clear by Defendant Cushman & Wakefield U.S. Inc.’s (“Cushman”) opposition to the Motion to Remand, as well as Plaintiffs’ reply, the amount-in- controversy and citizenship of the Parties (both Plaintiffs, Cushman as well as AMD) is not in dispute. See Dkts. 21, 24. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand and Motion to Dismiss both turn…