Kimberly Starling, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20252:24-cv-08644California324 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

JS-6

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY STARLING, individually and ) Case No. CV 24-8644 FMO (KSx) on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) 12 ) Plaintiff, ) 13 ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. ) 14 ) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, et ) 15 al., ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ) 17 ) 18 The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations, but 19 no substantive action has been taken in this matter. (See, generally, Dkt.). Now, the court is 20 informed that the parties have settled and that plaintiff will dismiss the action. (See Dkt. 43, Joint 21 Status Report). 22 Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the class will result from 23 the dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without 24 prejudice as to the class claims and with prejudice as to the individual claims. The dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.