MARIO DE VERA v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20253:25-cv-07814California937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO DE VERA, Case No. 25-cv-07814-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff, proceeding without attorney representation, filed this state-law employment discrimination action in Alameda County Superior Court. He alleges he was fraudulently enticed to take an early buy out and that when many years later he was rehired, Defendant retaliated against him. Defendant removed the action to federal court alleging federal question and diversity subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. After carefully considering the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES the motion to remand. Defendant has established the Court at least has diversity subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.