Jared Rasmussen v. Fox Corporation; Fox Cable Network Services, LLC; Christopher Ganny; Gregory Ochotoreña; Diijon Williams; Anna Druker; and Does 1-20, inclusive

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED RASMUSSEN, an individual, Case No. 2:25-cv-08115-SPG-PVC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 17] 13

14 FOX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; FOX CABLE NETWORK 15 SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware company; 16 CHRISTOPHER GANNY, an individual; 17 GREGORY OCHOTORENA, an individual; DIIJON WILLIAMS, an 18 individual; ANNA DRUKER, an 19 individual; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 17 (“Motion”)) filed by Plaintiff 23 Jared Rasmussen (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and considered the Motion and 24 concluded that it is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); 25 C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the 26 record in this case, the Court DENIES the Motion. 27 28 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 The following allegations are taken from Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 1-1 3 (“Complaint”)). Plaintiff was employed by…