Revels

Tyler Revels v. Holly, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20254:23-cv-04404California1,414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TYLER REVELS, Case No. 23-cv-04404-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

HOLLY, et al., Re: ECF No. 35 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 35. DISCUSSION I. Background In August 2023, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action alleging that, while he was detained at Santa Rita Jail in 2023, jail officials Tichia Holly and Gary Dean White violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of his religion by denying him four video visits over a six- day period because he was wearing religious headwear. See generally ECF No. 1. At the time that Plaintiff filed this action, Plaintiff was no longer housed at Santa Rita Jail and was instead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.