Kevin B. Williams v. Transworld Systems Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20254:25-cv-09527California1,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN B WILLIAMS, Case No. 25-cv-09527-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC., et al., Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Kevin B. Williams’s motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Mot.”). The Court DENIES the request. I. BACKGROUND On November 5, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that Defendant Transworld is unlawfully attempting to collect on disputed charges from Plaintiff’s medical procedure at UCSF and is threatening to furnish allegedly inaccurate credit data. See Dkt. No. 2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1–2. Plaintiff brings claims for financial elder abuse and violation of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act, the Rosenthal Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law, and the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act. Id. ¶¶ 20–39. Plaintiff also appears to assert some or all of these claims against the Regents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.