Jose Monteroso Agustin v. Fereti Semaia, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20255:25-cv-02788California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:25-cv-02788-SRM-JDE JOSE MONTEROSO AGUSTIN,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO Petitioner, WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT IN ITS v. ENTIRETY

FERETI SEMAIA, et al.,

Respondents.

17 18 On November 10, 2025, the Court granted in part Petitioner’s Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and directed Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1226(a), and among other actions, enjoined Respondents from transferring, relocating, or removing Petitioner outside of the Central District of California pending final resolution of this case. Dkt. 10. In addition, the Court required Respondents to show cause as to why the Court should not issue a preliminary injunction in this case. Id. Thereafter, Respondents filed a status report in response to the Court’s Order on 27 November 17, 2025, that states…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.