Keir Milan et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al.

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 Case № 2:24-cv-06323-ODW (MARx) 11 KEIR MILAN et al.,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 14 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., COMPLAINT [30] Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Keir Milan and Keirco, Inc. bring this putative class action for various 19 consumer protection violations and unjust enrichment against Defendant JPMorgan 20 Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 27.) Chase now 21 moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), Dkt. 23 No. 30.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Chase’s Motion and DISMISSES 24 the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety.1 25 26 27 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the 28 matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ.…