Vandatta

J.M.V. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20253:23-cv-03640California1,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J.M.V.,

Case No. 23-cv-03640-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. Commissioner of Social Security, SECTION 406(b) 10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 22

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Francesco Benavides (“Counsel”), who represented J.M.V. in this matter under a contingency fee agreement, brings a Motion for Award of Attorney’ Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Motion”), seeking an award of $11,000 in attorneys’ fees for work before this Court. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED. 1 II. BACKGROUND J.M.V. entered into a contingent fee agreement with Counsel providing that Counsel would be awarded 25% of all past-due benefits J.V.M. received as a result of this action. Dkt. no. 22-3. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and the Commissioner stipulated to a remand of this case for further proceedings. Dkt. nos. 11, 15. On December 20, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.