Larry Dunn v. Westwood Eye Center Optometric Services et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20252:25-cv-09668California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-09668-PD Date: November 25, 2025 Title Larry Dunn v. Westwood Eye Center Optometric Services et al

Present: The Honorable: Patricia Donahue, United States Magistrate Judge

Isabel Verduzco N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Why the Court Should Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over the State Law Claims

The Complaint asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and claims for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53, Disabled Persons Act, California Health and Safety Code, and negligence. In the Complaint, Plaintiff requests the court exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the California state law and negligence claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.