City of Coral Springs Police Officers Pension Plan v. Apple, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20255:25-cv-06252California2,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS POLICE Case No. 25-cv-06252-NW

OFFICERS PENSION PLAN,

6 Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL v. Re: ECF Nos. 12; Tucker ECF Nos. 26, 29, APPLE, INC., et al., 38 9 Defendants.

11 This is a securities putative class action brought against Apple, Inc. and its directors (collectively “Apple”). Before the Court are three motions to serve as lead plaintiffs and lead counsel filed by National Pension Service, on behalf of the National Pension Fund (“NPS”), Union Investment Luxembourg S.A. (“Union”), and KBC Asset Management NV (“KBC”). Having considered the parties' briefs and the relevant legal authority, and concluding that oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the hearing set for December 3, 2025. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS NPS’s motion and DENIES Union’s and KBC’s motions. I. BACKGROUND Though only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.