George

Filed 11/26/25 George v. Hartman CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

KOSHY PUTHUKKERIL GEORGE, H051697

(Santa Clara County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 21CH010234)

v.

ERIC FLOYD HARTMAN,

Appellant.

Eric Floyd Hartman appeals from an order granting a request to renew a civil harassment restraining order. Prior to the issuance of the original restraining order in this case, Hartman filed a peremptory challenge to disqualify the assigned judicial officer pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6,1 which was granted. Two years later, the disqualified judge granted the restraining order extension. Hartman contends the judge was disqualified from hearing the renewal request and acted in excess of jurisdiction…