Jones

Jared M. Villery v. Jay Jones, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20251:15-cv-01360California1,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:15-cv-01360-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN

PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

JAY JONES, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Docs. 129, 192 17 Plaintiff Jared M. Villery is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 16. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 26, 2021, defendants Escarcega, Jones, Scmidt, and Yerton moved for summary judgment as to plaintiff’s retaliation claims (1) against Jones and Schmidt stemming from attempts on January 21 and January 22, 2014 to move plaintiff to administrative segregation and a threat to bring disciplinary proceedings; (2) against Jones and Schmidt stemming from a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.