Medina
Aaron D. Seymour v. DOE 1, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON D. SEYMOUR, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01146-SKO Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER—
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DOE 1, et al., MOTION Defendants. (Doc. 40) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Aaron D. Seymour is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action.
I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND
21 On September 2, 2025, Defendant Medina filed a Motion for Summary Judgment 22 addressing the merits of Plaintiff’s claim. (Doc. 40.) Although more than 21 days have passed, 23 Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the summary judgment 24 motion. See Local Rule 230(l). 25 On October 6, 2025, this matter was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin to 26 the undersigned for all further proceedings. (Doc. 41.) 27 On October 7, 2025, Defendant filed a Notice of Plaintiff’s Failure to Oppose…