Ozer Holdings, LLC and Joint Properties, LP v. Citibank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20251:24-cv-00210California3,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OZER HOLDINGS, LLC AND JOINT No. 1:24-CV-00210-KES-CDB

PROPERTIES, LP,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 v. 11 CITIBANK, N.A., Docs. 20, 22 12 Defendant.

14 Defendant Citibank, National Association (“Citibank”) moves for reconsideration of this Court’s order, Doc. 20, granting in part and denying in part Citibank’s motion to dismiss, filed May 15, 2024. Docs. 9, 22. Citibank argues that the prior order did not address its threshold argument that it lacks privity with plaintiffs Ozer Holdings, LLC (“Ozer”) and Joint Properties, LP (“Joint”) and therefore cannot be liable on plaintiffs’ California Commercial Code section 11207 claims for Citibank’s handling of wire transfer requests it received from plaintiffs’ bank. Doc. 22. For the reasons set forth below, Citibank’s motion for reconsideration, Doc. 22, is granted. This Court’s June 23, 2025 order, Doc. 20, is amended as set forth below and Citibank’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.