James Curtis Kern v. A.F. Alphonso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20251:24-cv-01195California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CURTIS KERN, No. 1:24-cv-01195-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 13) A.F. ALPHONSO,

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff James Curtis Kern is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 21, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), found that plaintiff failed to state a claim, and granted plaintiff leave to amend. Doc. 5. On November 4, 2024, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). Doc. 8. The magistrate judge screened the FAC and issued findings and recommendations on November 25, 2024. Doc. 9. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations providing additional factual details not presented in his FAC. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.