Fletcher Legardy v. Sacramento City Council
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER LEGARDY, Case No. 2:24-cv-2353-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL. DISMISS Defendant. (ECF No. 14) 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sacramento City Council’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fletcher Legardy’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted1. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, brings claims based on his allegations that he designed and personally financed the construction of a new Sacramento jail in 1972. The motion to dismiss is fully briefed and a hearing was held on September 9, 2025. (ECF Nos. 14, 15, 16.) For the reasons that follow, the Court RECOMMENDS GRANTING Defendant’s motion to dismiss. / / / 27 1 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P.…