Weurth

Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr. v. J. Weurth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20252:25-cv-01161California258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LAMONT BUNN, JR., No. 2:25-cv-1161 CKD P Plaintiff, v. J. WEURTH, ORDER AND Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 On September 2, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended complaint was due on October 6, 2025, but plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.