Rosendo Gonzalez, Jr. v. Butte County, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSENDO GONZALEZ, Jr. Case No. 2:25-cv-1491-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BUTTE COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, filed an amended complaint alleging claims relating to his April 5, 2025 arrest. Plaintiff’s allegations fail to state a viable claim, and I will dismiss his complaint without leave to amend. I will also deny plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 8, as moot. Legal Standard A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. A…