Oros

Martin Lee Foster v. Delbert Oros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20252:25-cv-02302California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:25-cv-2302 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DELBERT OROS, Defendant. 16 On August 29. 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order. The court notes that plaintiff submitted the court’s form application to proceed in forma pauperis to the court, but the form is not filled out. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.