Roton

Ruben Miguel Zepeda v. Officer Roton, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20252:25-cv-02439California1,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN MIGUEL ZEPEDA, Case No. 2:25-cv-02439-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A

v. MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND SUA

SPONTE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO

OFFICER ROTON, et al., PROSECUTE Defendants. (ECF No. 5) 16 Plaintiff Ruben Miguel Zepeda, proceeding without the aid of counsel, filed this action in Stanislaus County Superior Court on June 12, 2025.1 Compl. (ECF No. 1 at 4- 9). On August 25, 2025, Defendants Officer Roton and City of Turlock, erroneously sued as the Turlock Police Department, removed this action to this Court. Removal (ECF No. 1). On September 2, 2025, Defendants filed the pending motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(e) and noticed it for a hearing for October 14, 2025 before the undersigned. Defs. Mot. (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion was due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.