Sherman

David W. Wilson v. Stuart Sherman, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:22-cv-00874California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00874-JLT-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

THIRD REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO

v. OPPOSE PLAINTIFF’S SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND TO FILE

STUART SHERMAN, et al., CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. 73)

17 18 Plaintiff David W. Wilson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. The matter proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 20 conditions of confinement claims. I. BACKGROUND 22 On March 27, 2025, Defendants filed a summary judgment motion contending Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 50.)1 Plaintiff filed an opposition Doc. 56), and 24 Defendants filed a reply (Doc. 59). On May 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 61.)2 On May 28, 26 2025, Defendants filed a request for extensions of time to oppose Plaintiff’s summary judgment 27 1 This motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.