Brinton

Robert G. Saenz v. Brinton, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:23-cv-01303California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT G. SAENZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01303-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

v. (ECF No. 35)

BRINTON, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED

Defendants. ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2025 AS THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 36)

17 18 Plaintiff Robert G. Saenz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On February 29, 2024, the Court screened the first amended complaint and issued findings 21 and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon 22 which relief may be granted because it is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 482 (1994). 23 (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations on April 2, 2024. 24 (ECF No. 26.) 25 On August 22, 2024, while the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.