Cates
Julio Armando Munoz v. Cates
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO ARMANDO MUNOZ, No. 1:25-cv-00827 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
v. ACTION, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
CATES, (Doc. 13) Defendant. 16 On July 14, 2025, the magistrate judge issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response on August 7, 2025. (Doc. 9.) Following consideration of the response, the magistrate judge ordered Plaintiff to file a supplemental response to the order to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust prior to filing suit. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff did not file a response. On September 15, 2025, the magistrate judge discharged the order to show cause and issued findings and recommendation that recommended…