Cates

Julio Armando Munoz v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:25-cv-00827California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO ARMANDO MUNOZ, No. 1:25-cv-00827 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. ACTION, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

CATES, (Doc. 13) Defendant. 16 On July 14, 2025, the magistrate judge issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response on August 7, 2025. (Doc. 9.) Following consideration of the response, the magistrate judge ordered Plaintiff to file a supplemental response to the order to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust prior to filing suit. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff did not file a response. On September 15, 2025, the magistrate judge discharged the order to show cause and issued findings and recommendation that recommended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.