Singh

Pinki Singh v. Sunvir Johal, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:25-cv-00830California879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PINKI SINGH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00830-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND VACATING HEARING v. (ECF No. 7) SUNVIR JOHAL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. Defendants County of Madera, Deputy Daniel Lutz, and Deputy Michael Murphy have filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 10.) The Court has reviewed the motion and the opposition and has determined to take this matter under submission without a hearing. L.R. 230(g). Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “In the absence of . . . undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.