Macomber

Emerson Robert Gaitan v. Macomber et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:25-cv-00915California711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMERSON ROBERT GAITAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00915-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER RECALLING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 6) MACOMBER et al, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S Defendant. CONSTRUED MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

16 (Doc. No. 7)

ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 21 DAYS

20 Plaintiff Emerson Robert Gaitan, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 25, 2025. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff did not pay the $405 filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 4). On September 19, 2025, this Court issued Findings and Recommendation (F&R) to the district judge to deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff’s income level exceeded the federal poverty threshold under § 1915(a)(1) and Plaintiff’s application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.