Macomber
Emerson Robert Gaitan v. Macomber et al
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMERSON ROBERT GAITAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00915-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER RECALLING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v. (Doc. No. 6) MACOMBER et al, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S Defendant. CONSTRUED MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
16 (Doc. No. 7)
ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 21 DAYS
20 Plaintiff Emerson Robert Gaitan, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 25, 2025. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff did not pay the $405 filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 4). On September 19, 2025, this Court issued Findings and Recommendation (F&R) to the district judge to deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff’s income level exceeded the federal poverty threshold under § 1915(a)(1) and Plaintiff’s application…