Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:25-cv-00957California4,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00957-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND GRANTING FINAL

v. LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT

WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 13) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 On September 22, 2025, Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action. (ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s long form application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2, 7, 8.) During that time, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 4.) Before the Court could screen the first amended complaint, however, Plaintiff moved for leave to amend to file a second amended complaint, which the Court granted. (ECF Nos. 11, 12.) Though with regard to the second amended complaint, the Court now undertakes its initial screening, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.