Jasmen Lavar Hill v. Core Civic, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20251:25-cv-01360California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASMEN LAVAR HILL, Case No. 1:25-cv-01360-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE v. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORE CIVIC, et al., (Doc. 1)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jasmen Lavar Hill (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff alleges Defendants Core Civic, Centinela State Prison, Lancaster State Prison, and Corcoran State Prison violated his civil rights. See id. The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.