Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 202524-815California4,395 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALJIT SINGH, No. 24-815 Agency No. Petitioner,

A208-180-861

v.

OPINION

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 20, 2025 * Pasadena, California

Filed December 1, 2025

Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Ryan D. Nelson, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge R. Nelson; Concurrence by Judge VanDyke

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **

Immigration

The panel denied Baljit Singh’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of asylum and related relief, concluding that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination that Singh’s alleged harm did not rise to the level of past persecution and that he could avoid future persecution by relocating within India. The panel held that the alleged harms Singh experienced, including a warning to leave the Mann political party that was unaccompanied by physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.