Singh
Singh v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BALJIT SINGH, No. 24-815 Agency No. Petitioner,
A208-180-861
v.
OPINION
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 20, 2025 * Pasadena, California
Filed December 1, 2025
Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Ryan D. Nelson, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge R. Nelson; Concurrence by Judge VanDyke
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **
Immigration
The panel denied Baljit Singh’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of asylum and related relief, concluding that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination that Singh’s alleged harm did not rise to the level of past persecution and that he could avoid future persecution by relocating within India. The panel held that the alleged harms Singh experienced, including a warning to leave the Mann political party that was unaccompanied by physical…