Stevens

Stevens v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 202524-6315California959 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL STEVENS, No. 24-6315 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:24-cv-03005-EFS v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Michael Stevens (“Stevens”) appeals the district court’s order affirming an

administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his application for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.