People v. Alexander CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 2025B336492California1,289 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cody, J.

Filed 12/1/25 P. v. Alexander CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B336492 (Super. Ct. No. BA510916) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

DANIELLE ALEXANDER,

Defendant and Appellant.

The trial court found Danielle Alexander violated probation when she violated a protective order. The court revoked and reinstated probation on the same terms with the additional condition she serve 60 days in county jail. Appellant contends: (1) the court abused its discretion in revoking probation and sentencing her to county jail without any evidence she knew the protected person was living at the residence when she visited it; and (2) the court abused its discretion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.