Just Goods, Inc. v. Just, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUST GOODS, INC., Case No. 18-cv-02198-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER ASSESSING FURTHER
v. SANCTIONS, INDICATING INTENT
TO APPOINT A SPECIAL MASTER,
JUST, INC., et al., AND REQUIRING PARTY RESPONSE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 241, 243
In February of this year, I ordered defendants in this case—Eat Just (“EJ”) and Joshua Tetrik (together, “defendants”)—to pay $575,000 in sanctions, split equally between plaintiff Just Goods, Inc. (“JGI”) and the court. Order on the Per Diem Sanctions [Dkt. No. 228]. On July 18, 2025, I ordered defendants to pay an additional sanction of $82,500 because of their continued noncompliance with the parties’ 2017 term sheet. Third Order on Per Diem Sanctions [Dkt. No. 239]. In that Order, I noted: “It is my hope and expectation that defendants will attain full compliance by October.” Id. at 2. Neither hopes, expectations, nor $657,500 has been enough to bring EJ into compliance. …