Taylor

Relator LLC et al. v. William E. Taylor, Jr. et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20252:23-cv-00631California1,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RELATOR LLC et al., No. 2:23-cv-00631-DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING/DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

WILLIAM E. TAYLOR, JR. et al., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE

DEFENDANTS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 27)

17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff Relator LLC’s ex parte application for extension of time to serve defendants William Taylor, Jr. and Heath Quick. (Doc. No. 27.) On April 5, 2023, plaintiff filed this qui tam action pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. against defendants William E. Taylor Jr., Heath Quick, and Hometown Lender, Inc. (Doc. No. 1.) The action was sealed on April 5, 2023 (Doc. No. 2), then unsealed on April 11, 2025 after the government declined to intervene in this matter. (Doc. No. 18.) In its pending ex parte application, plaintiff represents that its previous lead counsel on this case, attorney Julian Brew, passed away on February 14, 2025. (Doc. No. 27-1 at 2.) Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.