Covello

Joseph D. Spillers v. Patrick Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20252:24-cv-01865California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH D. SPILLERS, No. 2:24-cv-1865 WBS CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The operative petition is the second amended petition filed October 2, 2024. In the second amended petition, petitioner claims he is entitled to more good conduct sentence credit that has been applied to his sentence. Respondent asserts the second amended petition should be dismissed. An application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody under a judgment of a state court can be granted only for violations of the Constitution or laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A federal writ of habeas corpus is not available for alleged error in the interpretation or application of state law. See Wilson v. Corcoran, 562 U.S. 1, 5 (2010); Estelle v. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.