Ledwidge

Niall Ledwidge, et al. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20255:24-cv-08352California3,727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NIALL LEDWIDGE, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-08352-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., [Re: ECF No. 51] 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)1 and former FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 51 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 65 (“Reply”). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. See ECF No. 64 (“Opp.”). The Court heard oral argument on the motion on October 16, 2025. ECF No. 67. After oral argument, the Court set a supplemental briefing schedule addressed to the issue whether Plaintiffs’ agency standing theory is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.