Firsov
Sergey Firsov v. United Airlines, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SERGEY FIRSOV, Case No. 5:25-cv-03784-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
UNITED AIRLINES, INC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 64] Defendants.
12 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Sergey Firsov’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. ECF No. 64 (“Mot.”). Defendant Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft (“Lufthansa”) opposes the motion. ECF No. 79 (“Opp.”). The motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Firsov moves for sanctions on four grounds. First, Mr. Firsov alleges that counsel for Lufthansa “illegally and aggressively investigated Plaintiff’s family life” by submitting a declaration attaching the California Judicial Council List of Vexatious Litigants, on which his name appears. Mot. at 1. Second, Mr. Firsov argues that…