Feldman

Nathan Feldman v. Alto Neuroscience, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20255:25-cv-06105California1,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NATHAN FELDMAN, Case No. 25-cv-06105-NW

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPOINTING LEAD

v. PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL

ALTO NEUROSCIENCE, INC., et al., Re: ECF Nos. 21, 23 Defendants.

12 This is a securities putative class action brought against Alto Neuroscience, Inc. and its directors (collectively “Alto”). Before the Court are two motions to serve as lead plaintiffs and lead counsel, the first from Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P., and Special Situations Life Sciences Fund, L.P. (collectively, the “Special Situations Funds” or “SSF”) and the second from Eileen Beiter and Nathan Feldman (the “Individuals”). Having considered the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, and concluding that oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the hearing set for December 3, 2025. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS SSF’s motion and DENIES the Individuals’ motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.