Gonzalo Romero Hernandez, et al. v. City of Vallejo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20252:25-cv-00900California5,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GONZALO ROMERO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-00900-CSK et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., (ECF No.10) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court are Defendants City of Vallejo, Jason Ta, Pablo Lopez, and Rosenda Mesa’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in part and motion to strike pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(f). Defs. Mot. (ECF No. 10).1 A hearing by Zoom was held on September 2, 2025.2 (ECF No. 19.) Melissa Nold appeared as counsel for Plaintiffs and Katelyn M. Knight appeared as counsel for Defendants. (ECF No. 19.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion. Defendants’ motion to strike is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants’ motion to strike paragraphs

26 This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.