Arroyo

facts in the light most favorable to Association and Figgers as the prevailing parties. We resolve in favor of the trial court’s decision “ ‘any conflict in the evidence or reasonable inferences to be drawn from the facts.’ ” (Estate of

Young (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 62, 75-76.)

Association is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation4 incorporated in 1994 to manage the common interests of the Pacific Ridge subdivision. The subdivision consists of 607 homes in San Diego, California, and is governed by articles of incorporation, bylaws, and an amendment to a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s). Association’s amended election rules, adopted in December 2019 (the election rules), govern the

Arroyo’s factual background states many facts without record citation. We disregard unsupported assertions. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(C); see County of Sacramento v. Rawat (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 858, 861.)

In its respondent’s brief, Association states it is a nonprofit public benefit corporation. Association’s bylaws, however, state that it is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, and the trial court so found. The Corporations Code section…