REV Capital v. ALO CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 2, 2025B340812California6,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 12/2/25 REV Capital v. ALO CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

REV CAPITAL, INC., B340812

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 24STCV03957) v.

ALO, LLC, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Curtis A. Kin, Judge. Affirmed. Miller Nash, Bernie Kornberg and Nicole M. McLaughlin for Defendants and Appellants. Levinson Arshonsky Kurtz & Komsky, Steven N. Kurtz and Paul G. Murtagh for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendants ALO, LLC (ALO) and Bella+Canvas LLC (Bella+Canvas) appeal the trial court’s order granting REV Capital (California) Inc.’s (REV) applications for pretrial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.