Victor Jacuinde Medina v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202520-72799California974 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR JACUINDE MEDINA, No. 20-72799

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-464-581

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 1, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Victor Jacuinde Medina (Petitioner), a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the denial of his

applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We deny

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition.

When “the BIA conducts its own review of the evidence and law,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.