Pichay
Pichay v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202524-4528California1,062 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VICTOR MILLADO PICHAY, No. 24-4528 Agency No. Petitioner, A203-223-199 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 21, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Victor Millado Pichay, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture
(“CAT”) protection. He also contends that the BIA abused its discretion and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violated due process by denying him a second extension of time to file a brief and
then…