Boysen

Boysen v. Peacehealth, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202524-5204California755 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARA BOYSEN; et al., No. 24-5204 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 6:23-cv-01229-AA v.

MEMORANDUM*

PEACEHEALTH, INC.; PATRICK

ALLEN; Gov. KATE BROWN; LIZ

DUNNE; DOUG KOEKKOEK; TODD

SALNAS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 9, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sara Boysen and other former PeaceHealth employees (collectively,

“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims with prejudice.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs were terminated after refusing to vaccinate against COVID-19 in

violation of Defendant PeaceHealth’s COVID-19 vaccination…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.