Mickey
United States v. Mickey
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
DEC 3 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6478 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:15-cr-01201-BTM-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
WILLIE DWAYNE MICKEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 18, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Willie Dwayne Mickey appeals the denial of his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 and affirm.
Neither 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) nor U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 violates the
nondelegation doctrine. Congress delegated to the United States Sentencing
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Commission the power to create policy statements that district courts must follow
when reducing a defendant’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See…