Marcos
Marcos v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202525-76California468 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAULINA MARCOS; A. D. M. M., No. 25-76 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A245-224-576
A245-224-578
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Paulina Marcos and her minor child, a derivative petitioner, are
citizens of Guatemala. They seek review of a decision by the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing Marcos’s appeal of the immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her asylum, statutory withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…