Marcos

Marcos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202525-76California468 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULINA MARCOS; A. D. M. M., No. 25-76 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A245-224-576

A245-224-578

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Paulina Marcos and her minor child, a derivative petitioner, are

citizens of Guatemala. They seek review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing Marcos’s appeal of the immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her asylum, statutory withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.